Term paper

Work on any case study is a largely creative process. Plus, in every team, your work style and approach to accomplishing tasks are built in different ways. Nevertheless, years of practice and examples of the brightest victories of the past allow us to formulate several universal tips and highlight the key points that should be taken into account for each team that dreams of succeeding.

Everything is quite complicated and at the same time simple. It is difficult, because you need to put everything out completely – both intellectually and physically. Simply, because, in fact, on the way to victory you need to do only three things: to assemble an ideal team, to solve the case qualitatively and to present your decision perfectly.

Recommendations on planning the work of solving a case study

In order to present an exhaustive solution to the case, the team usually has a week. According to the good old student tradition, many teams postpone work on the case for the last few days or even hours. Do not repeat their mistakes! The victory, grades and respect of the teacher are usually received by those who reasonably distributed their strength and engaged in solving a case study from the first day.

We recommend that you plan the case solution as follows:

  • Day 1-2. Thoughtfully read the text, trying to understand what, in fact, they want from you. You need to read really carefully, in silence and with a marker in your hand. Highlight key goals, formulate tasks. If you think it is necessary, look for additional information on the subject of the case, and then try to put forward a preliminary hypothesis. Do not forget to devote time to organizational issues: outline the decision structure and methodology of analysis, distribute responsibilities among team members.
  • Days 3-4. Work in parallel, accumulating and gradually analyzing information. The ready parts of the solution are better to be made into slides at once and sent to the team member who is making up the final presentation.
  • Days 5-6. Connect all the disparate parts together, make a clear decision, draw conclusions and structure everything that you have in the end.
  • Day 7. During the day, work on the structure of the presentation, complete it, check and double-check the key data. Be sure to spend the day before presentation together with a team. This is not only useful for business, but also fun. Do not forget to arrange a rehearsal of your presentation.

Like a consultant: try an approach with hypotheses

Starting to think over the case, try out the method used by strategic consultants in their work. First of all, they structure the field of activity: define the boundaries of the project, divide it into components. When the information is collected and properly organized, the consultant puts forward a hypothesis, to confirm which he collects the necessary facts. All data is generated in a logical tree.

Having made certain conclusions within the framework of his hypothesis, the consultant offers some alternatives. Among them, one is selected, with the help of which the task posed in the case can be solved. If none of the alternatives is suitable, you need to test another hypothesis.

Use the method of consultants when you need to have certain experience. At first, because of inexperience, you can miss a lot of things and make a big mistake. But you need to practice because the method of hypotheses significantly speeds up the process of solving a business problem, thus solving a case study.

Term paper

How to write a review to term paper?

For many students of colleges, graduate students and research workers the issue of writing highly academic works is quite problematic. In particular, it can be difficult to take into account all requirements and correctly compile a review for the publication. Today I decided to post information on how to write a review of a scientific article, an example of which can be seen later.

What is a review

Before the publication of the article in a serious publication, it is necessary to write a review of it. In this review is considered one of the most important parts in the selection and approval of works. In addition, it improves the quality of published articles. In order to publish an article in the journal from the VAK List, at least two reviews are required. The same requirements exist for a number of publications that are preparing to submit documents to be included in this list. However, similar reviews are required for other purposes in the framework of higher education and the submission of scientific publications. This applies to humanitarian and technical specialties, and introduces difficulties for both students, for example, undergraduates, and researchers.
Some people think the term “reviewing” is intricate, but it can be described quite simply: the article is checked for consistency and authenticity of content, as well as compliance with the requirements for design. However, such a simple procedure is connected with subjective discretion of reviewers. Therefore, you need to know exactly how to properly draw a document, and what it should contain. A review is a special document that is compiled by a reviewer. The latter can be a scientist with a degree who understands the content of the publication, and also works in the same field, specializes in the same discipline as the author. The reviewer summarizes the publication analysis, evaluation. All this is done in accordance with special criteria. Also estimate the volume, compilation of annotations, the choice of keywords in different languages. Still looking at how well the links are written correctly, how the bibliography is framed.

Types of reviews

Depending on the purpose of the compilation, the document can be written by different reviewers. It can be of the following varieties:

An internal review is made by the supervisor. The teacher’s signature is certified by the university or the institution in which the author is trained or works.

External review – for this reviewers are appointed editors of journals or members of the editorial board. One way or another, the document should be composed of specialists with authority and academic degree. To make sure that your work is appropriate for that level, you may get help from essay writing online services that have a great number of specialists.A number of organizations require the person who will write it, the availability of printed publications in profile magazines over the past few years (usually three years).

The approximate plan of drawing up

There are two options for the plan, how to write a review of the article. The first option can be called simplified, and the second one is already somewhat more complicated and more detailed. If you are interested in a simpler plan that allows you to understand how to correctly write a review, then it includes such items: introduction about the subject of the study; personal impressions of the read, the main aspects that shape the course of publication; the degree of importance of the problem that is covered; conclusions. This plan is more suitable for students and novice reviewers who do not have enough experience to write critical remarks. The question of volume is ambiguous, since this nuance will largely depend on a particular topic and scientific discipline. Usually the review takes up to three and a half thousand printed characters. This corresponds to approximately 1.5 pages of Word text with 12 pins. In order to give a response to the stylistic perfection, be sure to use special turns and thematic expressions, which will underline your professionalism and awareness in the subject and discipline. If you want to do everything correctly, adhere to special rules of drawing up the document. In this case, your feedback will be accepted in a specialized publication and evaluate as high college term paper.